SUPREME COURT OF CANADA BULLETIN OF PROCEEDINGS
http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/bul/2003/html/03-12-23.bul.html
29569 Her Majesty the Queen v. Grant
Wayne Krieger (Crim.) (Alta.)
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Major and Fish
JJ.
The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of
Alberta
(Calgary), Numbers 01-00011-A and 01-00288-A, dated March 18, 2003, is dismissed.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Criminal law - Cannabis marihuana -
Cultivation and trafficking - Accused cultivating cannabis marihuana for his own medical
needs and supplying others as well - Trial judge finding that prohibition on production of
cannabis marihuana infringing accused's s. 7 Charter rights and not saved by s. 1 -
Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s. 7 of the Charter
guarantees the right to grow (and by implication, possess) marihuana, to anyone with a
medical need for this drug - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that, by reason
of s. 7 of the Charter, to sustain the validity of the general prohibition on
the production (and by implication, possession) of marihuana, the government of Canada is
obliged to ensure a legal, safe, and reliable source and supply of this drug for anyone
with a medical need for it - Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19,
ss. 5(2), 7(1), 56.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY |
Section 7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, inasmuch as it relates to cannabis marihuana, declared inconsistent with the Charter; declaration suspended for one year; Respondent granted an exemption from the application of s. 7(1); charge stayed |
|
June 20, 2001 |
Applicant acquitted of possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of trafficking contrary to s. 5(2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act |
|
November 28, 2001 |
Period of judicial stay extended until further order of the Court of Appeal |
|
December 4, 2002 |
Acquittal on s. 5(2) set aside and new trial ordered; appeal with respect to s. 7(1) dismissed |
|
March 25, 2003 |
Motion to extend time allowed |
|
May 20, 2003 |
Application for leave to appeal filed |