Lasychuk won't offer more profitable game! JCT: Google for "Brantford Poker rules" and you'll get my page or recommendations and complaints about non- performance: http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/olgc.htm After my saying "What's your name, I want to complain" to an Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee, another Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee banned me from the government-controlled premises for 1 month. After 9-11, government employees have greater powers. Sure, this is a fight over the decision of an employee in a gaming arcade but it costs the government revenue and citizens more taxes or less services. The whole issue is about my wanting a $25/$50 $16/hour Holdem game at 45 hands per hour instead of the usual $20/$40 $14/hour game at 36 hands per hour. A pit boss named Brit McManus refused to foster the more profitable game. On his shift, "It's not going to happen." I thought that was pretty uppity from a servant. Another employee named Corrie was offended that I'd be offended that she had denied our request to play the more-profitable game for the house when I said "what's your name, I want to complain." Finally, Shift Manager Michael Harrington decided that fomenting request among the gamblers who had been refused our desired game was disruptive. Remember, after 9-11, complaining against government agents may not be allowed. Then, I wrote to Casino Manager J. Lasychuk pointing out how Brit McManus was causing the casino to lose $500 a day by fostering the less profitable game and weakening the more profitable game for the house and objecting to being banned for generating complaints. No answer thus costing the Brantford Charity casino $15,000 every month since then. No response from this Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee. Then I wrote to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty who's an Ottawa boy who should know I'm an expert in poker systems engineering and poker game engineering and should have taken such inept casino management seriously. But this isn't about how I know how to make more money with a casino than Dalton does, it's about why Dalton won't take my advice and make the more money himself. No response. So when returned after my exile, I wondered what Mr. Jay Lasychuk had decided to do. I asked to be put on the list of the active $14/hr $20 game and to start up a list interested in the $16/hr quarter game. He did and up on the screen went my name in the $20 column and first on a new $25 column. Two columns on second screen, not just one. Later when I came back, a new room manager had deleted the $25 list. Sid explained that that was the new policy. They would have a "side list" to keep track of interest but they wouldn't put it up so anyone could see it. So no one would know! It was policy from on high. So there might be 18 players willing and ready to pay $16 an hour but we won't know that Brit's not letting us because we can't see our list of interested players. I find it incredible that a casino manager could buy Brit McManus's "Let's foster the less profitable game" strategy s to the point of no longer offering the more profitable game. Mr. Lasychuk should up in Dalton's cabinet with that kind of performance. No one expects a professional politician like Dalton to have any business acumen but one would expect his employees to. It may only sound like a drop in the bucket of Dalton's incompetence but it's a pretty big drop for the city of Brantford that gets 5% of the casino take, Mr.Lasychuk adopting Brit's blunder has cost our city $1500 in the past2 months. Last week: Brantford Expositor May 4 2006 City Hall budget "crisis" may mean job cuts by Michael Allan Marion Municipality squeezed by shrinking provincial funds and rising costs JCT: What if all of Dalton McGuinty's employees have as much business acumen as the Brantford Bunch? "There are no easy cuts to make anymore. If there are staff cuts to be made, we should do it sensitively. JCT: Who knows how much those who don't know the "theory of winning" can be losing for us? Here's an obvious 15 grand a month, $750 a month for Brantford, that some of those soon- to-be-cut employees, sensitively, might get upset about. I did send a copy to the mayor so if he does nothing, I'll be able to make as much fun of his lack of business acumen as his provincial counterpart, the only difference being that in the Parkdale-High Park riding, Dalton hears it from his TV unless he shows up to an all-candidates' debate while the Brantford mayor can be reminded of what the Brantford Charity Casino's lack of business acumen has cost the province and the city. And, of course, the May 27 Brantford Expositor just reported how 28 Local groups, projects share $74,000 in grants. That's 28 local groups averaging $2,500 each and I'm going to send them all this information about how Mr. Lasychuk buying Brit McManus's less-than-bright idea has cost the province $30,000 so far, $1500 of which would have been Brantford's share. Brantford would have had 4 extra grants to hand out if John Turmel were running the Brantford Poker Room. Just in case they don't get a grant next year, they should know how the Brantford Bunch helped do it to them. And to make sure they don't run it like Turmel said to, right, Lasychuk has chosen to run it wrong. Imagine how much fun I'm going to have explaining to the voters in the upcoming Ontario ParkDale-High Park by-election when I can point at the tens of thousands of dollars someone with more business acumen than Dalton, a professional politician, could be making. And the the Brantford Mayor can answer why he didn't act to save those four extra grants Brit McManus and Jay Lasychuk insist on losing for Brantford and Ontario. You have to wonder where these guys got their casino management training. They certainly wouldn't have lasted long at my Casino Turmel. $175,000 lost for just one table! Could they be running all the other games in the casino as badly too? Is this just par for the course under the direction of Premier Dalton "Disaster" McGuinty? The little-profit taker? Not. http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/olgc.htm for full story. Lasychuk won't offer more profitable game! JCT: Google for "Brantford Poker rules" and you'll get my page or recommendations and complaints about non- performance: http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/olgc.htm After my saying "What's your name, I want to complain" to an Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee, another Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee banned me from the government-controlled premises for 1 month. After 9-11, government employees have greater powers. Sure, this is a fight over the decision of an employee in a gaming arcade but it costs the government revenue and citizens more taxes or less services. The whole issue is about my wanting a $25/$50 $16/hour Holdem game at 45 hands per hour instead of the usual $20/$40 $14/hour game at 36 hands per hour. A pit boss named Brit McManus refused to foster the more profitable game. On his shift, "It's not going to happen." I thought that was pretty uppity from a servant. Another servant named Corrie was offended that I'd be offended that she had denied our request to play the more- profitable game for the house when I said "what's your name, I want to complain." Finally, Shift Manager Michael Harrington decided that fomenting request among the gamblers who had been refused our desired game was disruptive. Remember, after 9-11, complaining against government agents may not be allowed. Then, I wrote to Casino Manager J. Lasychuk pointing out how Brit McManus was causing the casino to lose $500 a day by fostering the less profitable game and weakening the more profitable game for the house and objecting to being banned for generating complaints. No answer thus costing the Brantford Charity casino $15,000 every month since then. No response from this Ontario Lotteries and Gaming Commission employee. Then I wrote to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty who's an Ottawa boy who should know I'm an expert in poker systems engineering and poker game engineering and should have taken such inept casino management seriously. But this isn't about how I know how to make more money with a casino than Dalton does, it's about why Dalton won't take my advice and make the more money himself. No response. So when returned after my exile, I wondered what Mr. Jay Lasychuk had decided to do. I asked to be put on the list of the active $14/hr $20 game and to start up a list interested in the $16/hr quarter game. He did and up on the screen went my name in the $20 column and first on a new $25 column. Two columns on second screen, not just one. Later when I came back, a new room manager had deleted the $25 list. Sid explained that that was the new policy. They would have a "side list" to keep track of interest but they wouldn't put it up so anyone could see it. So no one would know! It was policy from on high. So there might be 18 players willing and ready to pay $16 an hour but we won't know that Brit's not letting us because we can't see our list of interested players. I find it incredible that a casino manager could buy Brit McManus's "Let's foster the less profitable game" strategy s to the point of no longer offering the more profitable game. Mr. Lasychuk should up in Dalton's cabinet with that kind of performance. No one expects a professional politician like Dalton to have any business acumen but one would expect his employees to. It may only sound like a drop in the bucket of Dalton's incompetence but it's a pretty big drop for the city of Brantford that gets 5% of the casino take, Mr.Lasychuk adopting Brit's blunder has cost our city $1500 in the past2 months. Last week: Brantford Expositor May 4 2006 City Hall budget "crisis" may mean job cuts by Michael Allan Marion Municipality squeezed by shrinking provincial funds and rising costs JCT: What if all of Dalton McGuinty's employees have as much business acumen as the Brantford Bunch? "There are no easy cuts to make anymore. If there are staff cuts to be made, we should do it sensitively. JCT: Who knows how much those who don't know the "theory of winning" can be losing for us? Here's an obvious 15 grand a month, $750 a month for Brantford, that some of those soon- to-be-cut employees, sensitively, might get upset about. I did send a copy to the mayor so if he does nothing, I'll be able to make as much fun of his lack of business acumen as his provincial counterpart, the only difference being that in the Parkdale-High Park riding, Dalton hears it from his TV unless he shows up to an all-candidates' debate while the Brantford mayor can be reminded of what the Brantford Charity Casino's lack of business acumen has cost the province and the city. And, of course, the May 27 Brantford Expositor just reported how 28 Local groups, projects share $74,000 in grants. That's 28 local groups averaging $2,500 each and I'm going to send them all this information about how Mr. Lasychuk buying Brit McManus's less-than-bright idea has cost the province $30,000 so far, $1500 of which would have been Brantford's share. Brantford would have had 4 extra grants to hand out if John Turmel were running the Brantford Poker Room. Just in case they don't get a grant next year, they should know how the Brantford Bunch helped do it to them. And to make sure they don't run it right like Turmel said to, Lasychuk chose to run it wrong. Imagine how much fun I'm going to have explaining to the voters in the upcoming Ontario ParkDale-High Park by- election when I can point at the tens of thousands of dollars someone with more business acumen than Dalton, a professional politician, could be making. And the the Brantford Mayor can answer why he didn't act to save those four extra grants Brit McManus and Jay Lasychuk insist on losing for Brantford and Ontario. You have to wonder where these guys got their casino management training. They certainly wouldn't have lasted long at my Casino Turmel. $175,000 lost for just one table! Could they be running all the other games in the casino as badly too? Is this just par for the course under the direction of Premier Dalton "Disaster" McGuinty? The little-profit taker? Not. http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/olgc.htm for full story.